Gestos com os pés: descrição de uma listagem

Autores

  • Isabel Galhano Rodrigues Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto; Centro de Linguística da Universidade do Porto

Resumo

Numa abordagem linguística dos estudos do gesto, apresenta-se um estudo de caso que testemunha a robustez do gesto. Será descrita uma listagem, uma atividade comum de organização do discurso, que consiste na enunciação de uma sequência de unidades caracterizadas por paralelismo sintático, prosódico e gestual. Neste exemplo, o falante (vítima da Talidomida) não tem membros superiores, mas gesticula com os pés. Através da análise das modalidades envolvidas na execução da listagem, mostra-se como os gestos dos pés assumem as funções desempenhadas pelos gestos manuais. O exemplo evidencia não só a forte ligação entre gesto e fala, mas também a corporização da atividade de listar, resultante da necessidade de indexar ideias ou objetos ao mundo real.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Alibali, M. 2014. Embodiment – the body and its role for cognition, emotion, and communication. In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. H. Ladewig; D. McNeill; S. Teendorf (Eds.). Body–language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1833-1840.

Auer, P.; Couper-Kuhlen, E. 1994. Rhythmus und Tempo konversationeller Alltagsprache. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 96, 78-106.

Boersma, P.;Weenink, D. 2008. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. [Computer Pro- gram] Version 6.0.37, retrieved 14 March 2018 from http://www.praat.org/

de Ruiter, J.P. 2007. Postcards of the mind: the relationship between speech, imagistic gesture and thought. Gesture. 7 (1), 21-38.

ELAN, the software annotation tool. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Open sourse software. https://tla.mpi.nl/ tools/tla-tools/elan/ (acedido a 5 de abril de 2018).

Enfield, N.J. 2011. Elements of Formulation. In: J. Streeck; C. Goodwin; C. LeBaron (Eds). Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 59-66.

Enfield, N.J.; Kita, S.;de Ruiter, J.P. 2007. Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. Journal of Pragmatics. 40, 1722–1741.

Galhano-Rodrigues, I. 2007. O corpo e a fala. Lisboa: FCG/FCT.

Galhano-Rodrigues, I. 2012. Vou buscar ali, ali acima! A multimodalidade da deixis no português europeu. Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto. 7, 129-164.

Galhano-Rodrigues, I. 2015. A tool at hand - gestures and rhythm in listing events: case studies of European and African Portuguese speakers. OSLa: Oslo Studies in Language. 7 (1), 253-281.

Galvão, E.Z. 2015. Gestures. In: F Pöchhacker (Ed.) Routledge encyclopedia of interpret- ing studies. London: Routledge, 552.

Goldin-Meadow, S. 2003. Hearing Gesture. How hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Goldin-Meadow, S. 2013. How our gestures help us learn? In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S.H. Ladewig; D. McNeill; S. Teendorf (Eds.). Body–language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 792-803.

Goldin-Meadow, S. 2017. What the hands can tell us about language emergence. Psy- chonomic Bulletin and Review. 24 (1), 213–218. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1074-x.

Gumperz, J. 1992 Contextualization and understanding. In: A. Duranti A.; C. Goodwin (Eds.). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229-252.

Kendon, A. 2004.Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kendon, A. 2013. Exploring the utterance roles of visible bodily action: A personal ac- count. In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill; S. Teßendorf (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 7-28.

Kita, S.; Özyürek, A. 2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language. 48, 16–32.

Ladewig, S. 2014. Recurrent gestures. In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill; J.Bressem (Eds.) Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1558–1574.

Levinson, S.C.; Holler,J. 2014. The origin of human multi-modal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. DOI:10.1098/ rstb.2013.0302.

McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McNeill, D. & Duncan, S.D. (2000). Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In D. Mc- Neill (Ed.), Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141-161. Müller, C. 2013. Introduction. In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill;

S. Teßendorf (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1-6.

Müller, C. 2004. Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? In: C. Müller; R. Posner (Eds.) The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. Proceedings of the Berlin conference, April 1998. Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag, 233- 256.

Müller, C; Cienki, A.; Fricke, E.; Ladewig, S.; McNeill, D.; Teßendorf, S. (Eds.) 2013. Body- Language - Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. (HSK 38.2). Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Müller, C.; Ladewig, S.; Cienki, A.; Fricke, E.; McNeill, D.; Bressem, J. (Eds.) 2014. Body - Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. (HSK 38.2). Vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Özyürek, A.; Kita, S. 1999. Expressing manner and path in English and Turkish: Differences in speech, gesture, and conceptualization. In: M. Hahn; S. C. Stoness (Eds.). Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. London: Erlbaum, 507-512.

Payrató, L.; Tessendorf, S. 2014. Pragmatic gestures. In: C.Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill; J. Bressem (Eds.) Body – Language – Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Ber- lin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1531-1539.

Ramachandran, V.; Blakeslee, S. 1998. Phantoms in the Brain. New York: Quill.

Selting, M.; Auer, P.; Barden, B.; Bergman, J.; Couper-Kuhlen, E.; Günthner, S.; Meier, C.; Quasthoff, U.; Schlobinski, P.; Uhmann, S. 1998. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkrip- tion-ssystem (GAT). Linguistische Berichte. 173, 91-122.

Sloetjes, H.; Wittenburg, P.2008. Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).

Streeck, J. 2009. Gesturecraft. The manufacture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Streeck, J. 2013. Praxeology of gesture. In: C. Müller; A.Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill; S. Teßendorf (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 674- 688.

Zlatev, J. 2013. Levels of embodiment and communication. In: C. Müller; A. Cienki; E. Fricke; S. Ladewig; D. McNeill; S. Teßendorf (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 533-550.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-06-03