Case opacity and Cliticization: On intervention and the triggers of different agreement patterns
Abstract
We will show that there are two types of languages which involve different mechanisms in obviating Minimality Violations/Defective Intervention and Case Opacity: Agreement languages of Punjabi/Icelandic-type with default agreement and Movement languages of Romanian/Spanish-type with phi-feature movement in form of cliticization. On the basis of rich empirical data we show that Case Opacity represents a case of defective intervention in agreement as the features of the phases introducing the oblique arguments block the agreement with the verb. Potential counterexamples can be accounted for by assuming that (oblique) clitics, in some languages, do not always move to T, so that the phi-features of the arguments they introduce still intervene and give rise to default agreement – as in Vafsi and some other Western Iranian varieties. Crucially, our approach has theoretical implications for the theory of case, cliticization and linear order.
Downloads
References
Abels, K. 2004. Successive Cyclicity, Anti-Locality, and Adposition Stranding. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Anand, P. & A. Nevins. 2006. The locus of ergative case assignment: Evidence from scope. In: Johns, A., D. Massam & J. Ndayiragije (Eds.). 2006. Ergativity: Emerging issues, 3–27. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Alexiadou, A., E. Anagnostopoulou & C. Sevdali. 2014. Opaque and Transparent Datives, and How They Behave in Passives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17: 1-34.
Anagnostopoulou, E. 2003. The syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Berlin/ NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.
Anagnostopoulou, E. 2005. Cross-linguistic and Cross-categorial Variation of Datives. Advances in Greek Generative Syntax. In: M. Stavrou & A. Terzi (Eds.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baker, M., & Ü. Atlamaz. 2013. On the Relationship of Case to Agreement in Split Ergative Kurmanji. Ms. Available at:http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~ua46/assets/pdf/ mb_ua_draft.pdf
Bleam, T. 1999. Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Delaware.
Bobaljik, J. D. 2008. Where’s Phi? Agreement as a postsyntactic operation. In: D. Harbour, D. Adger and S. Béjar (Eds.), Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces, 295-328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, H. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bruening, B. 2014. Defects of Defective Intervention. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 707-719. Boeckx, C. 2008. Aspects of the syntax of agreement. London: Routledge.
Boeckx, C. & A.J. Gallego 2008. Clitic Climbing by (LongDistance) Agree. Paper presented at Meeting clitics. Workshop on explanatory proposals of clitics. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, 18-29 August 2008.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In: R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N., 2001. Derivation by Phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1-54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Comrie, B. 2013. Ergativity in Iranian languages. A typological perspective. Hand-out of a talk given at International Conference on Iranian Linguistics, University of Bamberg, 2013, August 24-26.
Coon, J. 2013. Aspects of split ergativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Caro, G. 2008. Remarks on alignment variation in Mâsâli (Southern Tâleshi), Ms. SOAS, London.
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. 2012. Linguistic typology: An Iranian perspective. Journal of Universal Language 13. 31-70.
Deal, A. R. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: evidence from “selection”. Syntax 12: 285-323.
Diaconescu, C., R. & Rivero, M. L. 2005. An Applicative Analysis of Double Object Constructions in Romanian. Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. University of Ottawa.
Franks, S. 2014. Multiattachment Syntax, “Movement” Effects, and Spell–Out. In: Kosta, P., S. Franks, T. Radeva-Bork & L. Schürcks (Eds.), Minimalism and Beyond. Radi- calizing the interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haig, G. 2008. Alignment change in Iranian languages: A construction grammar approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Haider, H. 2004. Pre- and postverbal adverbs in VO and OV. Lingua 114: 779-807. Hale, K. & S. J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In: K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halle, M. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In: B. Bruening, Y. Kang & M. McGinnis (Eds.), MITWPL 30: Papers at the Interface, 425-449. MITWPL: Cambridge, MA.
Holmberg, A. & T Hróarsdóttir. 2003. Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions. Lingua 113: 997-1019.
Jaeggli, O. 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Jaeggli, O. 1986. Three Issues in the Theory of Clitics: Case, Doubled NPs, and Extraction. In: H. Borer (Ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, 15-42. New York: Academic Press. Karimi, Y. 2013. Extending defective intervention effects. The Linguistic Review 30: 51-77.
Kayne, R. 1975. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, L. 2011. Possessive WITH in Germanic: HAVE and the role of P. Syntax 14: 355-393.
Malchukov, A. L. 2008. Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 118: 203-221.
Manzini, M. R. & L. M. Savoia. 2011. Reducing “case” to denotational primitives: Nominal inflections in Albanian. Linguistic Variation 11: 76-120.
Manzini, M. R. & L. Franco. 2016. Goal and DOM datives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. 34: 197-240.
Manzini, M. R., Savoia, L. M., & L. Franco. 2015. Ergative case, Aspect and Person splits: Two case studies. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 62: 297-351.
Marchis Moreno, M. to appear. ‘Minimal Link Constraint’ Violations: Move vs. Agree. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Marchis Moreno, M. 2015, Relational adjectives at Interfaces. Studia Linguistica 69: 304-332.
Marchis Moreno, M. & A. Alexiadou. 2013. The syntax of clitics revisited: Two types of clitics. Lingua127: 1-13.
Marchis Moreno, M. & C. Petersen. 2014. On locality effects in Brazilian Portuguese and Romanian: hyper-raising vs. LDA. Paper presented at LSRL44, London, Ontario, May 2-4, 2014.
McGinnis, M. 1998. Locality in A-Movement. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT. Moravcsik, E. A. 1978. Agreement. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 331-373.
Ormazabal, J. & J. Romero. 2013. Objects Clitics, Agreement, and Dialectal Variation. Probus 25: 301-344.
Pesetsky, D. 2013. Russian Case Morphology and the Syntactic Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Preminger, O. 2008. Breaking agreements: distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 619-666.
Preminger, O. 2011. Agreement as a Fallible Operation. PhD dissertation, MIT. Pylkkänen, L. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rezac, M. 2008. Phi-Agree and theta-related Case. In: D. Harbour, D. Adger, & S. Béjar (Eds.), Phi theory: Phi-features across interfaces and modules, 83-129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rivas, A. M. 1977. A Theory of Clitics. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Rivero, M. L. 2004. Spanish Quirky Subjects, Person Restrictions, and the PCC. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 53-66.
Rizzi, L. 1986. On chain formation. In H. Borer, The Syntax of pronominal clitics, 65-95. New York: Academic Press.
Rizzi, L. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Rizzi, L. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of Grammar, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, L. 2004. Locality and Left Periphery. In: A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol.3, 104-131. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sportiche, D. 1999. Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure. Subjects, agreement, case and clitics. London/New York: Routledge.
Starke, M. 2001. Move Dissolves into Merge. PhD Dissertation, University of Geneva. Stilo, D. 2004. Grammar notes. In: D. Stilo (Eds.), Vafsi Folk Tales. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 223-244.
Stilo, D. 2009. Case in Iranian: From reduction and loss to innovation and renewal. In: A. Malchukov & A. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 700-715. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stilo, D. 2010. Ditransitive constructions in Vafsi: A corpus based study. In: A. Mal- chukov, M. Haspelmath & B. Comrie (Eds.), Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, 243-276. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stronski, K. 2009. Variation of Ergativity Patterns in Indo-Aryan. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45: 237-253.
Suñer, M. 1988. The Role of Agreement in Clitic-Doubled Constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 391-434.
Thackston, W. M. 2006. Sorani Kurdish: A reference grammar with selected readings. Manuscript. Harvard University.
Toosarvandani, M. & C. van Urk. 2012. Directionality and intervention in nominal concord: Evidence from Zazaki ezafe. Poster presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS), City University of New York, Graduate Center, October 19th.
Torrego, E. 1988. A DP Analysis of Spanish Nominals. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts.
Torrego, E. 1998. The Dependencies of Objects. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Torrego, E. 2002. Arguments for a Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations based on clitics. In: S. Epstein & T. Seely (Eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, 249-268. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Uriagereka, J. 1995. Aspects of the Syntax of Clitic Placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79-124.
Woolford, E. 2006. Lexical Case, inherent Case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111-130.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Linguística Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
