Spanish double passives and related structures
Abstract
This paper studies the properties of a previously unnoticed passive construction found in some varieties of present day Spanish. Such construction, which we refer to as double passive (following NGRALE 2009), contains two adjacent passive complexes (Ese producto fue empezado a ser usado como conservante, Eng. That product was started to being used as a preservative), but only one of them is interpretable as a bona fide passive. We discuss the properties of this structure, suggesting that the passive (i.e., participial) morphology of the aspectual predicate (i.e., fue empezado) is uninterpretable, and obtained through a mechanism of agreement at a distance (Chomsky’s 2000, 2001 Agree).
Downloads
References
Adger, S; Bejar,S.; Harbour, D. (Eds.). 2008. Phi theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, A. 2010. Reduplication and doubling contrasted: implications for the structure of the DP and the AP. Linguística. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto. 5: 9-25.
Anagnostopoulou, E. 2003. The Syntax of ditransitives. Evidence from clitics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
Amadas, L. 2002. Tres arguments a favor de la naturalesa lèxica dels verbs aspectuals seguits d’una oració no finita. Llengua & Literatura. 13: 113-164.
Apothéloz, D. 2010. Le passé surcomposé et la valeur de parfait existentiel. French Language Studies. 20: 105-126.
Bhatt, R. 1999. Covert modality in non-finite Contexts. PhD. dissertation, UPenn.
Bhatt, R. 2005. Long-distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 757-807.
Baker, M.; K. Johnson; Roberts, I. 1989. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry. 20: 219-251.
Barbiers, S. 2006. The syntax of modal auxiliaries. In: Everaert, M.; Van Riemsdijk, H. (Eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Malden: Blackwell, 1-22.
Barbiers, S. 2010. Generalized syntactic doubling. Talk given at the Workshop on Linguistic variation in the minimalist framework. Casa de Convalescència, Barcelona, January 14-15.
Barbiers, S. et al. 2010. Meso-comparative syntax of perfect doubling. Tal given at the 4th European Dialect Syntax Meeting, San Sebastián.
Belletti, A. 2005. Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus. 17: 1-35.
Biberauer, T.; Roberts, I. 2007. Subjects, tense and verb-movement in Germanic and Romance. Ms., University of Cambridge.
Bobaljik, J.; Wurmbrand, S. 2005. The domain of agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 23: 809-865.
Boeckx, C. 2004. Long distance agreement in Hindi: some theoretical implications. Studia Linguistica. 58: 1-14.
Boeckx, C. 2008. Aspects of the syntax of agreement. London: Routledge.
Boeckx, C. 2009. On long distance agree. Iberia. 1: 1-32.
Bosque, I. 1999: El sintagma adjetival. Modificadores y complementos del adjetivo. Adjetivo y participio. In: Bosque, I.; Demonte, V. (Dirs.): Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, 217-310.
Bosque, I.; Torrego, E. 1995. On Spanish HABER and Tense. Langues et Grammaire 1, University of Paris 8, 13-29.
Brody, M. 1993. Theta theory and arguments. Linguistic Inquiry. 24: 1-23.
Browning, M. 1987. Null operator constructions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Caha, P. 2009. The nanosyntax of Case. PhD dissertation, University of Trømso.
Carruthers, J. 1994. The passé surcomposé régional: towards a definition of its function in contemporary spoken French. Journal of French Language Studies. 4: 171-190.
Carruthers, J. 1998. Surcomposé general et surcomposé régional: deux formes distinctes? In: Ruffino, G. (Dir.), Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Romanza, Vol. 2. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 143-154.
Cecchetto, C. 2000. Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus. 12: 93-126.
Chomsky, N. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In: Anderson, S.A.; Kiparsky, P. (Eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 232-285.
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1995. Categories and transformations. In The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 219-394.
Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In: Martin, R. et al. (Eds.) Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89-155.
Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In: Kenstowicz, M. (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-52.
Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, G. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads. The cartography of syntactic structures (vol. 4). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Collins, C. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax. 8: 81-120.
Contreras, H. 1992. On resumptive pronouns. In: Campos, H.; Martínez Gil, F. (Eds.), Current studies in Spanish linguistics. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 143-165.
Contreras, H. 1993. On null operator structures. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 11: 1-30.
Cuervo, M. C. 2003. Datives at large. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Emonds, J. 1978. The verbal complex V-V’ in French. Linguistic Inquiry. 9: 151-175.
Epstein, S. D. 1989. On the derivation and representation of English ‘Tough’ constructions. Talk given at University of California - Los Angeles.
Fernández Soriano, O. 1995. Pronombres reasuntivos y doblado de clíticos. In: Goenaga, P. (Ed.), De Grammatica Generativa. San Sebastián: Publicaciones de la Universidad del País Vasco, 109-128.
Gallego, A.; Hernanz, M.Ll. 2010. Tipos de tiempo defectivo. Talk given at the IX Congreso General de Lingüística General, Universidad de Valladolid (Valladolid), 21-23 June 2010.
Hale, K.; Keyser, S. 1993. On the argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In: Hale, K; Keyser, S. (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 53-109.
Hartman, J. 2009. Intervention in tough constructions. In Proceedings of NELS 39.
Hernanz, M. Ll. 1999. El infinitivo. In: Bosque, I; Demonte, V. (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, 2197-2356.
Heycock, C.; Kroch, A. 1999. Pseudocleft connectedness: Implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic Inquiry. 30: 365-397.
Hiraiwa, K. 2001. Multiple Agree and the defective intervention constraint. In MITWPL #40. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Higgins, F. R. 1973. The Pseudo-cleft construction in English. Garland: New York.
Hornstein, N. 2001. Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jaeggli, O. 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Jaeggli, O. 1986a. Passive. Linguistic Inquiry. 17: 587-622.
Jaeggli, O. 1986b. Three issues in the theory of clitics: Case, doubled NPs, and extraction. In: Borer, H. (Ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics (Syntax & Semantics 19). Orlando, Academic Press, 15-42.
Kayne, R. 1975. French Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, R. 1989. Facets of romance past participle agreement. In: Benincà, P. (Ed.), Dialect Variation on the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, 85-104.
Kayne, R. 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica. 47: 3-31.
Kayne, R. 2005. Movement and Silence. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kornfilt, J. 1996. NP-Movement and “restructuring”. In: Freidin, R. (ed.), Current Issues in Comparative Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 121-147.
Kratzer, A. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon. Rooryck, J.; Zaring, L. (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 109-137.
Laca, B. 2002. Spanish ‘aspectual’ periphrases: ordering constraints and the distinction between situation and viewpoint aspect. In: Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (Ed.), From words to discourse. Elsevier: New York/Amsterdam, 61-93.
Larson, R. 2002. The grammar of intensionality. In: Preyer, G.; Peter, G. (Eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Larson, R.; Den Dikken, M; Ludlow, P. 1997. Intensional transitive verbs and abstract clausal complementation. Ms., Stony Brook /Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Lasnik, H. 1988. Subjects and the θ-Criterion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 6: 1-17.
Lasnik, H. 1995. Case and expletives revisited. Linguistic Inquiry. 26: 615-633.
Lasnik, H. 1996. Case and expletives: Notes toward a parametric account. In: Freidin, R. (Ed.), Current Issues in Comparative Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 162-189.
Lasnik, H. 2003. Minimalist investigations in linguistic theory. London: Routledge.
Lekakou, M. 2010. Perfect doubling. Ms., HO The Egg School in Constanta 2010.
López, L. 2007. Locality and the architecture of syntactic dependencies. New York: Palgrave.
Marantz, A. 2001. Words. Ms., MIT.
Marantz, A. 2007. Phases and words. In: Choe, S. H. (Ed.), Phases in the theory of grammar. Seoul: Dong In, 191-220.
Martin, R. 1996. A minimalist theory of PRO and control. PhD. dissertation, UConn.
Montalbetti, M.; Saito, M. 1983. On certain (tough) differences between Spanish and English. In: Sells, P.; Jones, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth annual meeting of the North East Linguistics Conference. Amherst: Mass./ GLSA publications. 191-198.
Moravcsik, E. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In: Greenberg, J. (Ed.), Universals in Human Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 297-334.
NGRALE 2009. Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, two vols.
Nunes, J. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Obata, M. 2010. Root, successive-cyclic and feature-splitting internal merge: Implications for feature-innheritance and transfer. PhD. dissertation. University of Michigan.
Olbertz, H. 2001. El orden de los constituyentes en la combinación de perífrasis verbales en español. Revista Española de Lingüística. 31: 431-453.
Ormazabal, J.; Romero, J. 2010. Object clitics and agreement. Ms., UPV/HiTT – UE/HiTT.
Paesani, K. 2001. The syntax and semantics of the passé surcomposé in modern French. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
Pesetsky, D.; Torrego, E. 2004. Tense, Case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In: Guéron, J.; Lecarme, J. (Eds.), The syntax of time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 495-537.
Picallo, C. 1990. Modal verbs in Catalan. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 8: 285-312.
Pylkkänen, L. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Poletto, C. 2009. Double auxiliaries, anteriority and terminativity. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics. 12: 31-48.
Režać, M. 2006. On tough movement. In: Boeckx, E. (Ed.), Minimalist essays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 288-325.
Rizzi, L. 1986. On the status of subject clitics in Romance. In: Jaeggli, O.; Silva Corvalan, C. (Eds.), Studies in Romance Linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris, 391-419.
Roberts, I. 1985. Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 3: 21-58.
Roberts, I. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation and defective goals, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roca, F; Suñer, A. 1997. Reduplicación y tipos de cuantificación en español. Estudi General 17/18: 83-119.
Ross, J. 1969. Auxiliaries as main verbs. In: Todd, W. (Ed.), Studies in philosophical linguistics (Series 1). Evanston, Il: Great Expectations Press, 77-102.
Sportiche, D. 1993. Clitic constructions. Ms., University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles (California).
Starke, M. 2002. The day syntax ate morphology. Class taught at the EGG summer school, Novi Sad.
Suñer, M. 1988. The Role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 2: 391-434.
Torrego, E. 1985. Pronouns and determiners: A DP Analysis of Spanish nominals. Ms., UMass Boston.
Torrego, E. 1996. Experiencers and raising verbs. In: Freidin, R. (ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 101-120.
Torrego, E. 2002. Arguments for a derivational approach to syntactic relations based on clitics. In: Epstein, S.; Seely, D. (Eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 249-268.
Travis, L. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. PhD. dissertation, MIT.
Uriagereka, J. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry. 26: 79-123.
Uriagereka, J. 2008. Syntactic anchors. On semantic structuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vicente, L. 2007. The syntax of heads and phrases. A study of verb (phrase) fronting. PhD Dissertation, Universiteit Leiden.
Wurmbrand, S. 2001. Modal verbs must be raising verbs. In: Bird, S. et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the 18th West coast conference on formal linguistics (WCCFL18), Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 599-612.
Wurmbrand, S. 2004. Two types of restructuring – Lexical vs. functional. Lingua. 114: 991-1014.
Wurmbrand, S. 2007. How complex are complex predicates. Syntax. 10: 243-288.
Wurmbrand, S. 2010. Parasitic morphology in Germanic: Consequences for the theory of feature checking. HO, U.Conn.
Zubizarreta, M. L. 1999. The cl(itic) projection in questions. Catalan WPL 7: 253-277.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Linguística Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
