Bridget D. SAMUELS. Phonological Architecture: A Biolinguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011. 252 pp. ISBN: 978-0-19-969436-5
Abstract
.
Downloads
References
Berwick, R. C., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B. & Chomsky, N. 2011. Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited. Cognitive Science 35: 1-36.
Blaho, S. 2008. The syntax of phonological theory: a radically substance-free approach.(PhD Thesis, Universitetet i Tromsø, Tromsø).
Blevins, J. 2004. Evolutionary Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Boeckx, C. & Grohmann, K. K. 2007. The biolinguistics manifesto. Biolinguistics 1(1): 1-8.
Boeckx, C. & Hornstein, N. 2003. The varying aims of linguistic theory. Ms. University of Maryland, College Park.
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. 1959. A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior.Language 35(1): 26-58.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In: K. Hale & S. J. Keyser. (Eds.). The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-49.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In: M. Kentstowicz. (Ed.) Ken Hale : A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-52.
Chomsky, N. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In: U. Sauerland & H. M. Gärtner (Eds.). Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1-29.
Di Sciullo, A.; Boeckx, C. 2011. The Biolinguistics Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D. & Chomsky, N. 2005. The evolution of the language faculty : Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97: 179-210.
Hale, M. & Reiss, C. 2000. Phonology as cognition. In: N. Burton-Philips, P. Carr & G. Dochery (Eds.). Phonological Knowledge. Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 161-184.
Halle, M. & Marantz. A. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In: K. Hale & S. J. Keyser. (Eds.). The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111-176.
Haspelmath, M. 2006. Against Markedness (And What to Replace It With). Journal of Linguistics. 42:25-70.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. 2002. The Faculty of Language: What is it, Who has it and How did It Evolve?. Science 298: 1569-1579.
Hume, E. 2004. Deconstructing Markedness: A Predictability-Based Approach. In: Proceedings of BLS 30, 182-198.
Inkelas, S. 1995. The Consequences of Optimization for Underspecification. In: Proceedings of NELS 25: 287-302.
Kiparksy, P. 1982. Lexical Phonology and Morphology. In: S. Yang (Ed.). Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 3-91.
Lenneberg. E. H. 1964. A Biological Perspective of Language. In: E. H. Lenneberg. (Ed.). New Directions in the Study of Language. Cambrdige, MA: MIT Press, 65-88.
Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R. 2005. The Faculty of Language: What’s Special about It?. Cognition 95: 201-236.
Raimy, E. 2000. The Phonology and Morphology of Reduplication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Linguística Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
